This really is imagined to be the "head over to" powder-or darn near it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge one could handload. It really is the inspiration for numerous pet loads, nevertheless I haven't been content with the results.
I've utilized H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i utilize it. There aren't numerous cartridges which i utilize it for as I seem to be constantly to gravitate to other powders. Even so, I can't state that it won't operate. It is just that some other powders do the job superior for any offered cartridge. For example, during the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and very high-quality groups with Nosler 140 AB. Having said that, RL19 was marginally superior in accuracy, while the velocity was nearly identical.
What is actually the difference? Compression. Without the Excessive/major compression affiliated with the extensive grain 7828, the tension curve was altered as well as the load fell apart.
I have had a handful of rifles that fouled really undesirable. Acquiring the many copper out was a true PIA right up until I discovered Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
The only real variance as I know it would be that the SC was created to get the job done as a result of powder steps much better (which it does). The extended grains usually do not feed very well in the least in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Did you at any time attempt H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Shooting 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with typical chamber. Asking yourself what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Validate YOUR AGE Specific states prohibit promotion or internet marketing of firearms, ammunition, and relevant firearm factors to minors. We’d like to ensure that you’re 18 several years of age or more mature prior to making it possible for you to buy our website. Are you h4831 vs h4831sc presently eighteen many years of age or older?
Like mentioned over, exact things. Everything is different is the size in the kernels. I did hear someplace that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I have no idea if that is definitely genuine or not but would sound right to me. I use SC since that's what I located in the 8 lb jug and it really works.
With all the smoother stream characteristics comes far more uniform demand weights, while the individual grains orient a lot more compactly, creating far better loading density.
You could have to produce a few additional posts to acquire cleared to complete PM's. When you finally get to that standing I'd h4831 vs h4831sc put up within the labeled reloading part to determine if any one is near you for your trade. Simply click to expand...
As with the 4831 vs 4831SC, These are the identical/identical powder cept for grain h4831 vs h4831sc dimensions. Load data is interchangeable.
Like All people explained, the SC stands for “shorter Minimize” and it is a bit simpler to meter. Tends to make you dilemma why they'd nonetheless make the frequent one particular.
Both contain the Similar burn up rate, shorter Minimize comes in helpful Should you be at max fill and never at tension/velocity you want you will get more shortcut in a very situation.
I sawed a single in fifty percent to determine how thick the jackets were, and they were being conveniently two times as thick being a 50-grain hollow point was. Ditto with the sixty four-grain Electricity Level, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know everything I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know just about anything in the least in regards to the 223. I doubt that you are going to get everywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's understand how it goes.